Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP a, D. Gordon Hasick DC a, Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD b, John F. Hart DC, MHSc c, Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC a, Craig P. Lapenski DC a

  1. Upper Cervical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, Texas
  3. Hart Research Consulting, Greenville, South Carolina
Objective: 

The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.

Methods: 

Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.

Results: 

There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, P = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, P = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.

Conclusion:

Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.

Read More